Municipal Liability Claims under 42 USC 1983 – Issues and Concerns

Loading Events

« All Events

  • This event has passed.

Municipal Liability Claims under 42 USC 1983 – Issues and Concerns

March 1, 2017 @ 1:00 pm

Municipal Liability Claims under 42 USC 1983 – Issues and Concerns
“Deliberate Indifference” as a Workable Standard of Conduct for Municipal Liability – Canton v. Harris and its offspring, Canton, Bryan County, and Connick….

Single Incident Monell Liability Threatens to Create Strict Liability in 42 USC 1983 Litigation
• Circuit Court split.
• Expert evidence / testimony can substitute for the policy, pattern or practice, or custom.

How can a personal standard of conduct “deliberate indifference” be superimposed on a municipality in the first place?

Does Los Angeles v. Heller really mean that if there is no individual constitutional violation on the part of the municipality’s employees, then there can be no “municipal” liability under the applicable constitutional standard.
• The “collective conscience” theory of liability.
• Circuit Court split.

How does the 14th Amendment “substitute” for the Eighth Amendment in pre-trial detainee claims against municipalities for failure to protect and conditions of confinement litigation in correctional facilities / jails, etc.
• Traditionally 42 USC 1983 has to be tethered to a “bill of rights” violation, first, fourth, eighth amendment, which have built in standards; 14th amendment is not such a “right” in and of itself.
• State tort law usually serves as the anchor point; 14th amendment claim has no such tether to 42 USC 1983 (so, where’s the tort?)

How can a personal standard of conduct “deliberate indifference” be superimposed on a municipality in the first place?
Individual standards changing, see Kingsley (Roberts statement); Costa coming back up?
• What about subjective / objective after Kingsley
• Fourth Amendment or Fourteenth – failure to protect / excessive force claims and the problem with imposing liability in the correctional environment.
• Is it “clearly established” right, duty, or law? Clearly established and qualified immunity.
• Municipal jails cannot serve as surrogates for mental health treatment facilities.

Speaker: Carson J. Tucker

2017 Distance Learning

Details

Date:
March 1, 2017
Time:
1:00 pm
Event Category:

*all times listed are in Eastern Standard Time
Webinars

To sign up for any Webinars on the calendar click here.
If you have any ideas on topics IMLA should cover, please email Ravinder Arneja at rarneja@imla.org.
WEBINAR BUNDLE DEAL: The entire office can receive all 40+ webinars at one low price for the year. Click here to learn more.
All past Webinars are available for purchase here.

Seminars
2025 IMLA Mid-Year Seminar
Washington, D.C.: April 25 – April 28, 2025
Omni Shoreham Hotel

Click here to learn more about the seminar.

2026 IMLA Mid-Year Seminar
Washington, D.C.: April 10 – April 13, 2026
Omni Shoreham Hotel

Conferences
2025 IMLA 90th Annual Conference
New Orleans, Louisiana: Friday, October 17 – Tuesday, October 21, 2025
Hilton New Orleans Riverside

Click here to learn more about the conference.

2026 IMLA 91st Annual Conference
Salt Lake City, Utah: Wednesday, September 23 – Sunday, September 27, 2026
Hyatt Regency Salt Lake City

2027 IMLA 92nd Annual Conference
Denver, Colorado: Thursday, October 14 – Monday, October 18, 2027
Hyatt Regency Denver at Colorado Convention Center

Other Events
IMLA in Italy
Lake Como, Italy
October 16-20, 2024

Click here to learn more about the program.