27 Sep The Supreme Court and Local Governments
Over at Cities Speak, Lisa Soronen of the State and Local Legal Center outlines upcoming Supreme Court cases that could affect local governments:
- Town of Greece v. Galloway: Do prayers at local meetings violate the Establishment Clause?
- Mount Holly Gardens Citizens in Action v. Township of Mount Holly: Can disparate impact claims be brought under the Fair Housing Act?
- McCullen v. Coakley: Is a “buffer zone” around a reproductive healthcare facility constitutional?
- Madigan v. Levin: May employees bring age discrimination claims directly under the 14th Amendment instead of under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act?
For a full preview, register to hear from Tom Hungar, Kannon Shanmugam, and David Savage on October 22nd here.
(2) More on Town of Greece
SCOTUSblog has some interesting commentary on Town of Greece, a case that we previously addressed here.
Eric Rassbach says that those challenging the Town’s prayer practice have reached a “‘Hail Mary'” moment” where “facing imminent disaster” they “stake[e] everything on one desperate, final gambit:”
They know that they lack five votes to affirm the lower court’s version of the endorsement test – indeed, more than five sitting Justices have criticized that test. They also know that the legislative prayers in this case, which were delivered by volunteer Christians, Jews, Bahá’ís, and Wiccans, are far more inclusive than the prayers upheld in Marsh v. Chambers, which were delivered exclusively by a paid Presbyterian minister. Thus, they have decided that the only way to avoid a bad ruling on Marsh and the endorsement test is to aim for a dramatic expansion of the coercion test.
(3) Last Term
Lisa Soronen and I spoke in August at the National Conference of State Legislatures 2013 Legislative Summit on significant Supreme Court cases affecting State and local governments. The hand-out that Lisa prepared discussing 14 cases is here; my presentation is here.
(4) Coming Soon: Can the Police Seize a Smartphone?
Alison Frankel highlights an issue that the Court might address soon: can the police seize smartphones under the Fourth Amendment? The issue arises in two pending cert petitions: Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie.