BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//IMLA - ECPv6.16.4.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:IMLA
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://imla.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for IMLA
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20250309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20251102T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20260308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20261101T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20270314T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20271107T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20280312T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20281105T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20261022T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20261022T143000
DTSTAMP:20260622T184548Z
CREATED:20260622T184548Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260622T184548Z
UID:10001765-1792674000-1792679400@imla.org
SUMMARY:First Amendment Webinar
DESCRIPTION:Debugging City Hall: The Practical\, Ethical\, and Litigation Risks of Lindke v. Freed at Two Years\nWhile the Supreme Court’s two-prong test is now familiar\, the operational gap between the doctrine and its daily application remains the hard part for municipal counsel. Lindke v. Freed replaced appearance-based reasoning with a structured test: actual authority to speak for the government on the specific matter\, and a purported exercise of that authority in the specific post or moderation action. Lower courts are still working out what that test means for individual officials\, mixed-use accounts\, and the moderation decisions that generate § 1983 claims. This program covers the doctrine\, the litigation file it produces\, and the practical problem of applying the test at the scale a municipal practice actually faces. \nProfessor Brian Owsley brings the bench’s reading of Lindke and the academy’s reading of how the lower courts are applying it. He is an author and IMLA presenter on First Amendment and § 1983 doctrine. \nTom Wright brings the operational side: what the litigation file looks like when it arrives\, what the ethics rules require when the city attorney is simultaneously defending the municipality and advising the individual official\, and how to structure compliance reviews that preserve privilege under model rules 1.6 and 1.13. \nChaz Stevens is the named plaintiff in Stevens v. LaMarca\, a § 1983 social-media-blocking matter against an individual state legislator\, the post-Lindke fact pattern lower courts are currently working out. He brings the plaintiff’s chair perspective and a structured method for measuring official-account exposure across the Lindke prongs\, presented to show defense counsel how a plaintiff maps a municipal digital record before the city knows a claim is brewing. \nSpeaker: Chaz Stevens\, Brian Owsley & Tom Wright
URL:https://imla.org/events/first-amendment-webinar-12-22-26/
CATEGORIES:Webinar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20271014T080000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20271018T120000
DTSTAMP:20240411T025249Z
CREATED:20240411T025249Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240411T025249Z
UID:10001291-1823500800-1823860800@imla.org
SUMMARY:2027 IMLA 92nd Annual Conference
DESCRIPTION:2027 IMLA 92nd Annual Conference\nDenver\, Colorado: Thursday\, October 14 – Monday\, October 18\, 2027\nHyatt Regency Denver at Colorado Convention Center \nClick here to learn more about conferences.
URL:https://imla.org/events/2027-imla-92nd-annual-conference/
CATEGORIES:Conference
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR