BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//IMLA - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:IMLA
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://imla.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for IMLA
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20160313T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20161106T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20170312T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20171105T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20180311T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20181104T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20170301T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20170301T130000
DTSTAMP:20260423T061946
CREATED:20200302T092627Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200302T092627Z
UID:10000816-1488373200-1488373200@imla.org
SUMMARY:Municipal Liability Claims under 42 USC 1983 – Issues and Concerns
DESCRIPTION:Municipal Liability Claims under 42 USC 1983 – Issues and Concerns\n“Deliberate Indifference” as a Workable Standard of Conduct for Municipal Liability – Canton v. Harris and its offspring\, Canton\, Bryan County\, and Connick…. \nSingle Incident Monell Liability Threatens to Create Strict Liability in 42 USC 1983 Litigation\n• Circuit Court split.\n• Expert evidence / testimony can substitute for the policy\, pattern or practice\, or custom. \nHow can a personal standard of conduct “deliberate indifference” be superimposed on a municipality in the first place? \nDoes Los Angeles v. Heller really mean that if there is no individual constitutional violation on the part of the municipality’s employees\, then there can be no “municipal” liability under the applicable constitutional standard.\n• The “collective conscience” theory of liability.\n• Circuit Court split. \nHow does the 14th Amendment “substitute” for the Eighth Amendment in pre-trial detainee claims against municipalities for failure to protect and conditions of confinement litigation in correctional facilities / jails\, etc.\n• Traditionally 42 USC 1983 has to be tethered to a “bill of rights” violation\, first\, fourth\, eighth amendment\, which have built in standards; 14th amendment is not such a “right” in and of itself.\n• State tort law usually serves as the anchor point; 14th amendment claim has no such tether to 42 USC 1983 (so\, where’s the tort?) \nHow can a personal standard of conduct “deliberate indifference” be superimposed on a municipality in the first place?\nIndividual standards changing\, see Kingsley (Roberts statement); Costa coming back up?\n• What about subjective / objective after Kingsley\n• Fourth Amendment or Fourteenth – failure to protect / excessive force claims and the problem with imposing liability in the correctional environment.\n• Is it “clearly established” right\, duty\, or law? Clearly established and qualified immunity.\n• Municipal jails cannot serve as surrogates for mental health treatment facilities. \nSpeaker: Carson J. Tucker  \n2017 Distance Learning
URL:https://imla.org/events/municipal-liability-claims-under-42-usc-1983-issues-and-concerns/
CATEGORIES:Webinar
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR